ilpost.it today launched a double intervention Facci & Socci (the gods), entitled "Faith in Explain that Saviano is not communist -for those who do not know crap about the Faith said Saviano to do even a disgust obviously Socci .
Now, I read it Gomorrah in the days when he went out, and do not remember him at every step, but I remember distinctly Saviano describe the system through which the monstrous and infamous big Italian companies doing business with the mafia, from the sewers of clothes for Angelina Jolie on account of I do not know which brand of extra luxury to the disposal of industrial waste. But in denouncing the intersection between crime and business, Saviano does not see it as a distortion of mercato, ma come una sorta di inevitabile conseguenza del capitalismo (anzi, una sua essenza).
O meglio, Saviano afferma che i metodi camorristici per ottenere appalti, riciclare soldi, spacciare e quant'altro siano di fatto una piena realizzazione del capitalismo neoliberista, insofferente (oggi mi vengono fuori degli eufemismi giornalistici, tant'è) a qualunque regola e vincolo. Non so se questo sia comunismo, ma una bella botta al capitalismo la dà.
Ho cercato al volo delle citazioni al riguardo, ed in effetti nel testo non sono pochi i riferimenti chiari e diretti. Ce ne sono alcuni che forse sono un poco obliqui:
-c'è il Kalashnikov «vero symbol of liberalism, [...] no matter who you are, no matter what you think, no matter where it comes from, no matter what religion you are, no matter against whom and for what, just what do you do with the Our product "(p.150),
-c 'is an analysis of changes in the drug market in Secondigliano and beds not only in terms of" laissez faire, laissez passer. Liberalism total and absolute. The theory is that the market regulates itself. [...] The absolute liberalization of the drug market has led to sinking prices . "(P.57)
-sharp and hasty phrases such as" All goods originating dark. It is the law of capitalism ' (p.25), o i camorristi visti, con una certa inventiva, come «samurai liberisti» (p.97)
Ma oltre a questi attacchi, che son più facili -ma nemmeno troppo- da eludere, ad un certo punto Saviano esplicita chiaramente la sua idea, quando scrive:
Non sono gli affari che i camorristi inseguono, sono gli affari che inseguono i camorristi. La logica dell'imprenditoria criminale, il pensiero dei boss coincide col più spinto neoliberismo. Le regole dettate, le regole imposte, sono quelle degli affari, del profitto, della vittoria su ogni concorrente. Il resto vale zero. Il resto non esiste. (p.97)
Online di tali temi se ne trovano alcune tracks, but alas, this thesis seems to me if they have talked very little, and unfortunately (understandably in need of vision and consensus for protection) I have not heard Saviano reiterate the concept. It is preferred that the ecumenical idea of \u200b\u200bbipartisan hero, fighting crime across, instead of a writer sided, biased (this is the evil of veltroni, from what I understand), that takes a chance and will retain the right to prove to give strong explanations, which contrast with other visions of reality-yes, this blog tries to remain seized of this reality.
short removal (that's our first) of these thesis of his book is disturbing, but we can not continue to propagate with such ease, many of the bloggers that are part of modern heterophile de ilpost.it often emphasize the fact-checking of Anglo-American tradition (see fleas and control what other journalists, politicians and the like state), the Director Luca Sofri has its own section on the Gazzetta dello Sport that deals with this, well, they would be asked to greater consistency.
0 comments:
Post a Comment